A Little Taste of Home | Property Valuation Manchester
A Little Taste of Home

For both tenants and landlords across the UK, the ongoing passage of the Renters’ Rights Bill through Parliament is a significant event. This legislation promises substantial changes to the private rented sector, and one area generating considerable discussion is the liability for pet-related damages. As of today, Tuesday 1st July 2025, the House of Lords has begun its “Report Stage” for the Bill, a critical phase where further examination and amendments are made.
Here’s one of the most talked-about updates: the UK Government has decided to remove the rule that would have allowed landlords to require tenants to get pet insurance. This change came in very late in the Bill’s journey through Parliament, essentially reversing what was planned.
Many, including politicians like former Housing Secretary Angela Rayner, previously thought that asking for pet insurance was a fair way to go. The idea was simple: if a pet caused damage, the insurance would cover it, meaning neither the landlord nor the tenant would be left unfairly out of pocket. So, this sudden removal of the insurance option has definitely raised some serious questions about how practical and fair the new rules for pets in rented homes will truly be.
In a proactive move, Propertymark met with The Earl of Kinnoull in January to discuss a proposal for an additional pet deposit, which would be equivalent to three weeks’ rent. This amendment has now been re-tabled for consideration during the Report Stage in the House of Lords. Propertymark continues to lobby for its acceptance, viewing it as a pragmatic way to protect landlords while simultaneously encouraging more pet-friendly rental options.
The news of the pet insurance requirement’s removal has been met with considerable concern from landlords and their representative bodies. The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has been particularly vocal, with its chief executive, Ben Beadle, describing the legislative process as “shoddy and outrageous.”
The core of the landlords’ apprehension is that they will now be primarily responsible for covering the costs of any damage caused by pets. While the Bill maintains a “presumption” that landlords should accept pets unless there’s a “good reason” not to, the lack of a clear financial safeguard like pet insurance could lead to unintended consequences. The NRLA warns that this shift could make it significantly harder for tenants with pets to secure rental housing, as landlords may become more risk-averse.
Landlords argue that they are being asked to shoulder greater risks without adequate consultation on the likely impact. These concerns are compounded by other aspects of the Bill, such as provisions that could allow tenants to accrue higher levels of rent arrears and perceived delays within the court system for possession cases.
The House of Lords will continue its Report Stage debates on the Renters’ Rights Bill on 7th July and 15th July 2025, before both Houses of Parliament rise for their summer recess later in the month. These debates will be crucial in determining the final shape of the Bill, including the outcome of the proposed pet deposit amendment.
The aim of the Renters’ Rights Bill is to enhance fairness and security within the private rented sector. However, the amendments concerning pet damage liability highlight the complex challenge of balancing tenant rights with landlord protections. The decision to remove the pet insurance requirement, in particular, has created a significant point of contention, with concerns that it could inadvertently limit housing options for pet owners.
As the legislative process continues, stakeholders will be keenly watching to see if a viable solution emerges that genuinely supports both responsible pet ownership and the financial interests of property owners.